Lyceum Assistant

  • Introduction to Scholastic Latin

    Tuis ergo obsequiis, lector, si quis veritatis, non novitatis amator occurreris, haec quaecumque sunt, offerimus tuoque iudicio mancipamus, certi, quod si quid boni repereris, non nostrum esse, facile poteris apprehendere. Vale. John Poinsot, Cursus Philosophicus – โ€œLectoriโ€, Quarta Pars Philosophiae Naturalis The study of Scholastic Latinโ€”by which specifically we mean the Latin which emerged from…

    Read โ†’

  • Questions of Tolerance

    Today’s Philosophical Happy Hour concerns the issue of โ€œtoleranceโ€. As Geoffrey Meadows, who will be leading the discussion, writes: Tonight I thought we might discuss the definition, limit, and moral status of โ€œtolerance,โ€ since our discussion on kindness uncovered this underlying sensibility of our age. Perhaps a series of guided questions can get us started…

    Read โ†’

  • John Poinsot – Cursus Theologicus

    Cursus Theologicus The work of John Poinsot, also known as Joannes a Sancto Thoma (though as John Deely noted, his name has often been given in many other variations, across English, Portuguese, Italian, Spanish, French, and Latin), has long been the victim of great neglect. His Cursus Philosophicus was critically-edited and published in the 1930s under the…

    Read โ†’

  • Love and Kindness

    Among the diverse ways in which people today live unreflectively, prominent is the attachment to kindness. Frequent are the admonitions to be kindโ€”and, indeed, often it is used as a defense for one’s moral righteousness when caught out in immoral actions: โ€œI’m not a bad person, I am kind…โ€ (as though being kind covered up…

    Read โ†’

  • Philosophy’s relation to Natural and Positive Law

    Can we understand the law in a non-philosophical manner? Can the jurist afford to disdain questions of philosophy? We must have consensus in certain disciplines, and the positive law is one of themโ€”but what grounds this consensus? Must we have a philosophical theory of the natural law? Can law truly be itself without a relation…

    Read โ†’

  • Connection of the Philosophical and the Pragmatic

    One could argueโ€”and I have myself many a timeโ€”that never before in human history has there been greater need for the presence of philosophical habit and the realization of philosophical wisdom. We find ourselves engaged in constant communication. Therefore, we find ourselves also immersed ever more in ideas. A theoretical grasp of those ideas seems…

    Read โ†’

  • The Moral Noetic of the Natural Law

    Law: the word, to many, conjures images of the courtroom or a legislatureโ€”ponderous tomes of tediously-written jargon rendering a complex web of oft-arbitrary-seeming stipulations and impingements.  So prevalent is this imagery that to speak of the โ€œnatural lawโ€ sounds often like a mere metaphor.  Exacerbating this โ€œmetaphoricalโ€ tenor of the phrase has been its use…

    Read โ†’

  • The Problem of Christian Philosophy

    The colloquium lecture delivered in May 2022 by James Capehart, PhD, โ€œThe Problem of Christian Philosophyโ€ is now available to the public. You can listen or download below (full lecture at the bottom). If you enjoy the lecture, please consider supporting our Summer fundraising campaign! Your donations allow us to support the work of philosophers…

    Read โ†’

  • Debate and the Hope of Resolution

    We at the Lyceum are strong believers in the fruits of disputationโ€”but does a disputation differ from a debate? What makes something a debate, rather than a disputation? Both, obviously, present a plurality of positions on a singular question. But what differentiates the two? As often the case, the words’ respective etymologies give a provisional…

    Read โ†’

  • Phenomenology: An Introduction

    What is phenomenology? This question has been asked, indeed, seemingly since the word โ€œphenomenologyโ€ was first introduced. It is a question, also, which gives testimony to a point often made by John Deely: efforts at philosophical innovation require either the posit of a neologism, in which case no one understands its significance, or the effort…

    Read โ†’