In this Lyceum Institute Colloquium, John Pinheiro (Acton Institute) examines Thomas Jefferson’s understanding of natural rights and argues that the Declaration of Independence is best understood within the organic English constitutional tradition of common law, rather than primarily through a Lockean framework. The lecture explores the relationship between natural rights language and inherited English liberties, emphasizing the role of common law, precedent, jury trial, and constitutional custom in shaping American political thought. Particular attention is given to Jefferson’s anthropology, his view of human nature and moral sense, and the implications these have for limited government, sovereignty, and the legitimacy of resistance.
Lyceum Institute Colloquium
Jefferson, Natural Rights, and the Sources of the Declaration of Independence
ABSTRACT: In this lecture, Dr. John C. Pinheiro will argue that the Declaration of Independence is best understood in the context of the organic English constitutional tradition of common law. This means intentionally looking at the Declaration in a non-Lockean way. The result should provide some surprising insight not only into American thinking during the Founding but into Jefferson’s thoughts on human anthropology, that is, on human nature and the implications that nature has for how we think about government. Students should come away with an important lens through which to see the Declaration and the thinking that shaped it and its reception.
The recorded Q&A session is available to all enrolled members.
No responses yet