Interview: On Being as First Known

News and Announcements

St. Thomas Aquinas presents in the corpus of his work (at, e.g., De veritate q.1, a.1, Summa Theologiae Ia-IIae, q.94, a.2, and In Metaphysicorum, lib.4, lec.3, n.605) the claim that what the intellect first conceives is being and that the intellect further resolves all conceptions into being.

But while the claim is presented repeatedly in his works, and has antecedents in the writings of Avicenna and Aristotle, it nevertheless is given only a passing and cursory treatment in Aquinas’—never delving too deeply into what is meant by the claim.  This led to the task of later Thomists, both medieval and modern, to try and give various readings and accounts of what is meant by this claim. In this episode interview, we were joined with Dr. Brian Kemple to discuss traditional readings of ens primum cognitum, in figures such as Thomas Cajetan and John of St. Thomas, and 20th century readings given by figures such as Etienne Gilson and Jacques Maritain, and draw out some of the shortcomings of their given readings.  Furthermore, we discussed Dr. Kemple’s own approach and reading of ens primum cognitum, the possible parallels that could be made in the domain of ens morale, the being of relations and relata, cognition-dependent being in our everyday world of experience, the twofold via resolutionis in Aquinas, issues on the problem of evil, and Heideggerian phenomenological parallels that could be made with Aquinas’ thoughts on cognition and being.

In addition, Dr. Kemple recommended several resources for those who would want to learn more and explore on their own at the end of the interview.

No responses yet

Leave a Reply

Subscribe

Subscribe to News & Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,818 other subscribers

Discover more from Lyceum Institute

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading